🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."